The International Journal of Surgical Nursing Therapeutics (IJSNT) follows a strict double-blind peer review process to ensure academic integrity, transparency, and high scholarly standards.

Review Model

The journal operates on a double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the evaluation process to ensure unbiased assessment.

Manuscript Evaluation Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo a structured evaluation process:

• Preliminary Screening:
  The editorial office checks each submission for scope alignment, originality, formatting compliance, and plagiarism.
• Expert Review Assignment:
  Manuscripts passing initial screening are assigned to at least two independent subject experts.
• Evaluation Criteria:
  Reviewers assess manuscripts based on:
  • Scientific originality and contribution
  • Methodological rigor
  • Clinical relevance in surgical nursing therapeutics
  • Clarity, structure, and academic writing quality
  • Ethical compliance and research validity
• Decision Categories:
  Based on reviewer feedback, manuscripts may be:
  • Accepted
  • Accepted with Minor Revisions
  • Re-evaluated after Major Revisions
  • Rejected

Editorial Decision

The final publication decision is taken by the Editor-in-Chief, considering reviewer recommendations and journal standards.

Confidentiality & Ethics

All manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. The journal strictly follows COPE ethical guidelines, ensuring integrity, transparency, and prevention of research misconduct.

Review Timeline

The standard review duration is 2–3 weeks, subject to reviewer response and revision cycles.